In a court of law, a person cannot be convicted of a crime
he thought about. He can’t even be held responsible for one that he planned and
dreamed about. Until he commits the crime, he is not guilty under the law. The
same was true under the law of the Old Testament. Through the Law, God provided
a code of conduct for the Israelite nation and included appropriate punishment
and penalties for violations. The Law made no provision for inappropriate
thoughts, but it clearly revealed God’s feelings about how people should treat
each other. Anyone who was paying attention should have realized that merely
being a law-abiding citizen was not all it took to please God.
When I worked in elections, I often found myself in the
position of weighing what the law said against the law’s intent. The purpose of
every election law on the books boiled down to: ensuring the voters’ rights;
protecting the privacy of each person’s ballot; and making sure each vote was
counted as the voter intended. I recall several occasions when strict adherence
to the letter of the law conflicted with our ability to comply with the intent
of the law. When deciding how to proceed, I would ask myself: If I had to
explain myself to a judge, which position would I rather defend?
There is no doubt that society is protected and improved by
unambiguous and enforceable laws, but Jesus presents a radical new perspective
on the Law: God’s intent. The Law serves not as a mere civil function but as a
personal (spiritual) one. God doesn’t want us to murder each other because he wants us to
love each other.
If you had to explain yourself in God’s courtroom, would, “I
didn’t kill him,” be an acceptable defense if you also didn’t love the person?
|
No comments:
Post a Comment